| 
What you need to know and say 
when they say: 
“But the Bible clearly condemns 
homosexuality!” 
Compiled and written* by Rev. Stephen 
Parelli 
June, 2012, Bronx, New York 
For this paper in word document format, click here | 
Introduction
This paper is a digest (in kind) of what some theologians, scholars and other notables have written on the Bible passages traditionally used to condemn homosexuals: Genesis 19; Lev. 18 and 20; Romans 1; I Cor. 9 and I Tim. 1; and Jude 7.
The intended use of this paper is to provide “talking points” that serve to support the proposition stated under each of the six topics presented. The outline is in four parts and is repeated per text(s) discussed: (1) Topic (heading), (2) In Point of Fact (stated proposition), (3) Talking Points (in support of the stated proposition) and (4) Conclusion (summary).
The object of this paper is to equip the reader (or, seminar participant as the case may be) with “talking points” so that he or she can succinctly speak in support of each In Point of Fact.
Contents
Topic #1: The erroneous use of the word “sodomite(s)” in the 1611 King James Bible (KJV; also known as the AV – Authorized Version)
Topic #2:  “The Gen. 19 notorious story of 
Sodom and Gomorrah [is] irrelevant to the topic” of homosexuality
Topic #3:   Modern Bible versions that use 
the word “homosexual(s)” or “homosexuality” in its translation of I 
Cor. 6:9 and I Tim. 1:10 are “driven more by ideological interests in 
marginalizing gay and lesbian people” than by 
scholarship
Topic #4:  Romans 1, probably the passage 
most often used to condemn homosexuals, isn’t about homosexuality
Topic #5:  Once the context is understood, it 
is clear that Lev. 18:22 and 20:13  – that a man should not lie with a 
man – is not a blanket condemnation of homosexuality
Topic #6:  The reference in Jude 7 to Sodom 
and Gomorrah “going after strange flesh” is perhaps best understand in 
light of a first century legend
This paper 
was first presented in Kampala, Uganda, in July of 2012, by the author, at two 
separate conferences. Copies of the paper were made available to 
conference attendees
 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment