Monday, February 18, 2013

Talking Points



What you need to know and say when they say:
“But the Bible clearly condemns homosexuality!”
Compiled and written* by Rev. Stephen Parelli
June, 2012, Bronx, New York
 
For this paper in word document format, click here
*Throughout this paper, the writing presented here is largely, but not entirely, in the words of the authors cited in brackets with some alterations in some instances, and in some cases the statement attributed to the author is actually a paraphrase or summary statement of what the author, cited in brackets, wrote.


Introduction


This paper is a digest (in kind) of what some theologians, scholars and other notables have written on the Bible passages traditionally used to condemn homosexuals: Genesis 19; Lev. 18 and 20; Romans 1; I Cor. 9 and I Tim. 1; and Jude 7.

The intended use of this paper is to provide “talking points” that serve to support the proposition stated under each of the six topics presented. The outline is in four parts and is repeated per text(s) discussed: (1) Topic (heading), (2) In Point of Fact (stated proposition), (3) Talking Points (in support of the stated proposition) and (4) Conclusion (summary).

The object of this paper is to equip the reader (or, seminar participant as the case may be) with “talking points” so that he or she can succinctly speak in support of each In Point of Fact.


Contents 


Topic #1: The erroneous use of the word “sodomite(s)” in the 1611 King James Bible (KJV; also known as the AV – Authorized Version)
 
Topic #2: “The Gen. 19 notorious story of Sodom and Gomorrah [is] irrelevant to the topic” of homosexuality
 
Topic #3: Modern Bible versions that use the word “homosexual(s)” or “homosexuality” in its translation of I Cor. 6:9 and I Tim. 1:10 are “driven more by ideological interests in marginalizing gay and lesbian people” than by scholarship
 
Topic #4: Romans 1, probably the passage most often used to condemn homosexuals, isn’t about homosexuality
 
Topic #5: Once the context is understood, it is clear that Lev. 18:22 and 20:13 – that a man should not lie with a man – is not a blanket condemnation of homosexuality
 
Topic #6: The reference in Jude 7 to Sodom and Gomorrah “going after strange flesh” is perhaps best understand in light of a first century legend
 
 
This paper was first presented in Kampala, Uganda, in July of 2012, by the author, at two separate conferences. Copies of the paper were made available to conference attendees

Friday, February 8, 2013

Gordon I. Herzog's Day of Remembrance: Full Circle -- From St. Louis to Africa and Back!

by Rev. Stephen R. Parelli
Bronx, NY
February 8, 2013


Gordon Herzog, Other Sheep
board member,
1992-2013
Photo by Steve Parelli
Gordon Herzog was a founding director of Other Sheep and a member of the Other Sheep board since its inception in 1992 until his passing on January 29, 2013.  Since 2005, when I became the Executive Director of Other Sheep, I had the privilege of getting to know Gordon during my annual visits to St. Louis, staying days at-a-time in his home.

Gordon's humanitarian accomplishments were considerable.  He served as president, chairman or director of:  Council of Intercity Ministries, Grace Hill Council, Episcopal Church Foundation, Episcopal City Mission, and St. Louis Airport Interfaith Chaplaincy; and he was a founding director of Grace Hill Neighborhood Services, Charles Kilo Diabetes and Vascular Research Foundation, Missourians for Freedom and Justice, Water Tower North, and Other Sheep.

There was, evidently, in addition to Gordon's boardroom contributions, his personal one-on-one activism and the interest he took in others, especially in queer people like himself.

I'm talking about Adam Matthews, Gordon's hired help who cared for Gordon's yard, and helped around the house in other ways (photo at left, taken February 2).  Gordon had told Jose, who is my husband, and me about his "good looking" help, and the good work he did, but we had never met Adam.  The morning of Gordon's memorial service, Adam and I met for the first time.  Adam came over to watch Gordon's dogs while Gordon's son Jeff and I left to attend the memorial service.  Having flown in from New York the day before, I was staying at Gordon's house, my usual place-of-stay when in St. Louis.

Upon meeting -- there at Gordon's home in the front entrance -- and making our introductions, Adam, with quite a bit of excitement said, "You're Other Sheep!  Gordon talked about you and your husband and Other Sheep all the time!"

It felt good to hear, I must admit.  But Gordon wasn't talking up Other Sheep to Adam just because of his admiration for Jose and me (though Gordon was known to do that). He was talking Other Sheep because Adam is an openly gay high school student who,  like all of us who are gay, is empowered by meeting and knowing others just like us.  And because Adam had a spiritual side to him that he desired to nurture, Other Sheep, a faith-based ministry designed to encourage LGBT people of faith, would be of interest to Adam, so Gordon was sure.  "Every day Gordon would ask me if I had visited the Other Sheep website," Adam told me.

Tom Hanks, co-founder
 of Other Sheep, is a
contributing
author to The Queer
Bible Commentary:  He
wrote the section on
Romans and Hebrews
 
Adam sat for a while and talked.  He told me how Gordon had helped him immensely by directing him to a welcoming and affirming Episcopal church.  Adam, a Roman Catholic and gay, had become disillusioned with church, understandably so. Now he was happily at home in a church that validated him just as he is.  

Later that day, after returning from the memorial service and the reception that followed, Adam showed me the single volume Bible commentary The Queer Bible Commentary, a resource book Other Sheep distributes when funds permit.  Gordon had shown the book to Adam, and Adam was reading it.


Rev. Stephen Parelli, left, with
Adam Matthews
Photo by Steve Parelli
We talked some more and then I excused myself.  I had an appointment to keep and I needed to place a call to confirm it. An African theological graduate student, a straight ally, pursing his studies now in America and living in the St. Louis area, who learned of Other Sheep while in Africa from someone Jose and I had directly worked with while we were in Africa, had read on my Facebook that I was coming to St. Louis.  He emailed me and asked to meet.  I was exhausted, having slept little the previous two nights; Adam quickly agreed to drive when I asked if he would.  Over the phone the African theologian said he was more than glad to have Adam join in, and with that Adam and I were off to meet another "other sheep," this one from Africa, who told us during our meeting that he was positioning himself theologically, through education, to someday "explode!" with the message of inclusion.  Already he had made a stir back home in Africa.  As a student in an evangelical school, he had spoken out to professors and fellow-students alike for gay equality within the church.


The driveway to Gordon's home: 
The day after Gordon's
Memorial Service, a peaceful
white blanket of new fallen
snow
Photo by Steve Parelli
It was a remarkable day, for me, this day of remembrance.  How better to remember Gordon's twenty years of service with Other Sheep than to begin the day by hearing Adam tell me personally, at Gordon's dinning room table, how Gordon had impacted his life.  And then, at the end of the day, with Adam, to visit a theological student from Africa whose life is dedicated to the study of God and full inclusion. 

Jose and I introduced Other Sheep to Africa in 2007.  It was Other Sheep's first venture outside of Latin America where Other Sheep started.  It was a bold step.  More daring than I realized at the time.  Gordon was there for us, supporting us, when Jose and I went to Africa, as was all the board of Other Sheep.  Now, on Gordon's day of remembrance, in Gordon's American city, I was in the home of an African who was greatly influenced by an Other Sheep activist in Africa.  And with me was Adam who Gordon helped personally along the path of spiritual nurturing. 

A type of "full circle," I would say:  Adam, the gay high school student who knew Gordon, the African "other sheep" young theologian, and myself, all geographically in the area where Other Sheep was legally formed, meeting on the day of Gordon's memorial service. Kind of a tribute to the legacy of Gordon and all the Other Sheep board of directors who, since 1992, have served with Gordon.

The day after Gordon's Memorial Service:  A view of the Missouri River,
the stretch of river where Gordon's home is located, easily identifiable
by the double bridge at the left, the bend of the river at the right,
and the two relatively narrow water ways that snake and cut in
and out of the land mass.
(After taking this photo, I did a Google Satellite overlook to
confirm the sighting I had made from the plane.)
Photo by Steve Parelli
 

Friday, February 1, 2013

"There would be no Other Sheep without Gordon"



Gordon Herzog
Other Sheep board member
1992-2013
Died January 29, 2013

A tribute to Gordon I. Herzog who served as a board member with Other Sheep from its inception in 1992 until his passing, January 29, 2013.

By Rev. Stephen Parelli,
Other Sheep Executive Director
Written January 29, 2013, Bronx, New York
Published on this Other Sheep Blog on February 1, 6:30 PM, Central Time, from Gordon's desk in his bedroom, Florissant, Missouri - where he always let me work online when visiting here.

We were sitting at a restaurant table, Rev. Thomas Hanks and I.

I can't remember if we were still in St. Louis after the Other Sheep 2012 November annual business meeting, or if we were in Chicago a week or so later, attending the American Academy of Religion and Society of Biblical Literature conference.

Either way, it was what Tom said that struck me: "There would be no Other Sheep without Gordon."


Tom Hanks
Co-Founder of Other Sheep
Other Sheep was the vision of Tom Hanks, American missionary in Argentina. But it took a Gordon Herzog, lawyer and boyhood friend to Tom Hanks, to make the dream a reality.

In 1992, just more than twenty years ago, Other Sheep was born in Argentina. Gordon had come out as a gay man years before Tom. When missionary Tom came out in Argentina in the late 1980s, he wrote a letter back home to his constituency. When Other Sheep was on the drawing board, it was just natural that Gordon, his longtime friend and lawyer, should be asked to write up the legal papers, sit on the board, and help promote Other Sheep at home in the USA. And Gordon did just that, for no less a reason than this: Tom was his friend.


Gordon's Home, Where the Other Sheep
Board of Directors often held their
annual meeting
Jose, my husband and Other Sheep Coordinator, and I came on board Other Sheep in 2005, and we've never had anyone, anywhere, love us more than Gordon, and in return we loved him, too. It couldn't be helped!

Every year, during the annual business meeting, we stayed in his grand home on the Missouri River, took trips with his car, worked at Other Sheep business in his "barn" - his lawyer's office - or at his desk and computer in his room. We spent evenings with him eating out, or visiting with him and his neighbor, or watching TV. We attended his church, met and had good times with his family, and watered his dogs. Gordon's home was our second home in so many ways. Jose and I relished our visits with Gordon. November's Other Sheep annual meeting was like going home, a reunion and trip we always were glad to make. We laughed together with Gordon, let him talk politics, borrowed his videos - returning them only to borrow more, raided his refrigerator, and kept a secret we promised to keep. We felt playful and giddy at Gordon's home, as if we could do no wrong.

The Missouri River, View from Gorond's Home 
Jose and I will miss him dearly. St. Louis is a special place to us because Gordon was there! And, oh yes, because St. Louis is the place where Gordon, and others who are also dear friends of Tom and Gordon, all made Other Sheep happen here in the United States with a focus on helping LGBT people of faith throughout the world.

Other Sheep, in its 20 years of history, has reached out and touched people in Latin America, Asia, Africa and Europe. Gordon shares greatly in that legacy. His life, through his work with Other Sheep, touches gay Christian people today around the world. One gay Christian man in Argentina, asking another gay Christian man in St. Louis to help, together and with the help of others, have ministered to gay and straight people in all parts of the world, affirming them and loving them, through Other Sheep.

Jose and I will miss you Gordon! And on behalf of all the people we've had the opportunity to meet, they join me in saying "Thank you for your love and service with Other Sheep."

Tom Hanks, left, and Gordon Herzog
November 10, 2012 - Following the annual Othre Sheep
board meeting, out for dinner at an area restaurant
 

Friday, January 25, 2013

What religion is this that loves but does not love?

Another turn of another decade in the years of my life,
and still, my mother cannot openly love me, her gay son.

By Rev, Stephen Parelli
January 24
and 25, 2013
Bronx, New York


As a gay activist and son, I finally, openly reflect on my mother's inability, after 15 years, to escape her homophobic religious surroundings in which my father, her husband who is a lay-pastor, dominates her life, manipulating her landscape
through the grid of his own dreaded, hidden, secret homoerotic feelings.

 
Yesterday my mother refused to speak with me on the phone when I
called her on my birthday. All she could say, in a soft-spoken voice,
was "OK" to each of my several awkward small-talk comments. Then
she said "I love you, I always have," and hung up. In 15 years times -
since I came out and entered into a same-sex union with my lover in
1997 - my mother and I have spoken perhaps 5 or 6 times.

I wish she could see this present-day, 2013, video of a Parsippany, NJ, high school student coming out to his classmates and suddenly realize,
like an epiphany, that we gays – by virtue of our omnipresence, if
nothing else – are not sinners from whom to separate. Ostracism is
one of the worst forms of abuse a person can suffer, so psychologists
tell us. We gays are people to love just as we are, not off-spring to
disown and disassociate from, to discharge as if suddenly we become
still-born when publicly coming out as gay.

I don't know why God made me this way . . . but I am . . . and I wish
they could all love me unconditionally (just as they once did): That my
parents and my children and my college friends from Bible college and
seminary days, and my former clergy peers and church friends since
my childhood, and my ex-wife (who knew before we married), -- that
they could all love me now, love me still.

God is my witness: I did not choose this! So, I will live it with gusto and
thanksgiving, honoring the God who blesses me with it.

Yes, I am gay and I am blessed with a husband of 15 years who holds
me in his arms at the end of each day and is lovingly, passionately
dedicated to our union. I hurt. He loves me, oh so tenderly, when I
hurt. With sympathetic eyes, he looks deep into mine while holding me.

They - my (former) family, (former) friends and (former pastor)
associates - are missing out on some of the greatest ventures and
accomplishments of my life. I miss them, but I cannot go back. I pray
they will, with love and affirmation, at long last step into the light with
me, and embrace me, and rejoice in God's creative diversity - so
obviously, universally attested to.

"I love you, I always have," my mother said as she silently hung up the
phone, shutting me out of her life again. How sad that she cannot live
the love she testifies of: the love for her first-born, a love she keeps
swallowed up in her breast. What religion is this that loves but does
not love?

I live the love I know, the love I have, the gay-love God has given me
that I, too, should live to the fullest. The moment is mine, it belongs to
those who love. I'm gay. I love. I’m present. I’m alive.

It is my mother who is still-born, tethered to a by-gone, man-made
church-based heterosexist moralistic era from which she cannot now
escape, forever closed-off to her son, knowing only the heart-beat of
her own lonely heart, making the choice to never see, or hear from,
her son.

She hurts.

And who is he who loves her, my mother, oh so tenderly, when she
hurts; who with sympathetic eyes looks deep into her own? It is my
father who late in life became a popular lay Baptist pastor in Central
New York, who became enamored with a new found prestige and
power, who when I said, as a married adult with four children, that ‘I
must tell my mother I’m gay because someone who loves me must
know,’ said to me, grabbing my throat with both his hands and raising
me bodily two inches completely off the floor by the strength of his
rage, “I will kill you if you tell your mother.” It is he, my father, who
comforts her, my mother, with goodly words like “Follow me as I follow
God.”

A year or two will pass before I call again and say, as I did yesterday, “I
just wanted to hear your voice, mom.” “OK” she will manage to say.
And just before hanging up, without the slightest hint that my one-way
conversation with her is over, will whisper “I love you, I always have.”
The phone will go dead and she will go on dying one day at a time,
believing she is honoring God and honoring her husband by aborting,
again, her mother-son relationship, believing she has made this holy
choice of abortion on her own accord when in reality she is tethered.
Tethered to an out-dated God who is majestically ascribed by some
worshipers as “the same yesterday, today and forever,”
misappropriating the sacred text to shield themselves from whatever
changes in society or in life they cannot face.

It is my father who cannot face life as he knows it. He is a homophobe
for reasons, he only knows, found deep in his dark heart. Reasons he
attempts to hide from others. What is it that makes him especially
hateful towards gays that he would say to his own son “I will take a bat
to your head if you attend your grandmother’s funeral?” or “All gays
should be taken out and hung” or “Your ten-year old son should never
see you, or your partner, again – what all gays ever do is molest
minors” or “If you ever tell your mother you are gay I will kill you” or
“I've told your children [ages 10 – 16] what kind of deviant, pervert you
are, and I am not sorry for having told them.”

Such hateful statements are as telling as they are hurtful.

Many argue that such hatred for gays is really a hatred of self because
of one’s own homoerotic feelings. It is not unthinkable that my father
falls into this category: a self-hating closeted bisexual or gay man. His
refusal to attend his granddaughter’s wedding (on the basis that it
would amount to adultery, being her second marriage); his refusal to
be his brother’s best man (same reason, a second marriage and
therefore legalized adultery); his refusal to acknowledge a shower for
his new-born grandchild (because the live-together parents had not
yet decided to be wedded and so they are, therefore, living in
fornication); and his insistence that his grandchildren should separate
from the man their sibling sister was to marry because he was outside
of the faith, all point to a hyper vigilance, and in most cases to a hyper
vigilance for moral or sexual purity.

It is not hard to see how my father’s hyper vigilance for sexual purity
and his open hatred for gay men may indicate a preoccupation with
unwanted homoerotic feelings.

One of the most telling accounts of my father’s fear of his homoerotic
feelings is this: When I was in seminary studying to become a pastor,
my father – much to my surprise – became a lay pastor (as I stated
above). This was in the early 1980s. He was in his late 40s. He had no
education beyond high school, no formal training in Bible or
counseling. I was about to be married. He wanted to give me some
father-to-son, pastor-to-pastor, advice about the marriage bed. He
told me this: “Let me tell you what I tell all the couples I counsel before
marrying them. I tell them not to practice oral sex on the male partner
for this reason. It will only increase the husband’s desire to look for
more of the same outside of the marriage and he will find himself
seeking out men who will provide the service.”

I was shocked to hear my father tell me he was giving this advice to
couples he marries, that, in fact, according to him, the heterosexual
marriage bed would, in deed, in this one case, foster desires on the
part of the husband for same-sex sex.

How un-insightful, on the part of my father, to fail to know that, at this
juncture of the counseling session, he was telling on himself! For all
his hiding and hyper vigilance to keep his homoerotic feelings unseen
and in tow, it was here in the counseling chambers of the pastor’s
office that he completely, unwittingly, let his secret escape him, telling it
to couple after couple.

So, yes, it is in this homophobic context that my mother squanders out
the last days of her life, living in mindless religious isolation with her
moralizing, parading, husband, separated forever from her gay son,
tethered to a homophobic God who is made over in the image of the
man who impregnates her with decades of his self-loathing, self-hating, because of his homoerotic feelings.

If time allows, and if I can muster it, I will phone her again months down
the road, and she will quietly say as she prematurely hangs up the
phone, “I love you, I always have,” while beseeching her asexual God
to forgive her once more for having bestowed a mother’s love upon a
despicable, God-forsaken son.

I will hear her words of love; I will be thankful for it; yet I will always
carry an amount of sadness that life, in her case – in our case, could
not be lived to the fullest as parent-child, as God had intended when
he created family.

Although my father's homophobia overshadows and beclouds my
mother's ability to clear her head and think, there are her own long-
standing, debilitating fears that play into my father's homophobic
disdain for his son.
 
From what I know of her puritanical lecturing over the years, this must
be added: it would appear that my mother's mother-son miscarriage is
due, in part, to an irrational fear she has of sexual misconduct
occurring in others, especially in others close to her. She spoke of this repeatedly, in one form or another, over the years.

So now, when you tie religion into all of this, you have both father and
mother, man and woman, paralyzed before a wrathful Edenic God who
created humankind as sexual beings and who, subsequently, sent
them out of the garden because of their disobedience. Sex, God and
their complex, internalized fears, all tied to gather, complicating their
relationships with others.

My parents always were their own, unscripted, abiding moral guides. The father, homophobic, forming his world and life view during the McCarthy era, was very much guarded - obviously so - as to what is and what is not masculine in himself and in his two sons. The mother, truly doomsday shocked, since the 50s and Elizabeth Taylor and Alfred Kinsey, at the new norms society was forging and re-forging, became the house spoksperson in the sex-revolution 60s for moral
awareness, for what is sexually right and wrong.

Now enter their seminary graduate, preacher-boy son, father of four,
divorcing his wife, openly gay, openly celebrating his new-found same-
sex lover.

My parents immediately resolved, without discussion or further
thought, and as a matter of course, due to their good Christian
character (rooted in their irrational respective sex-laden fears), to
never accept their son again, to never see him, to never talk with him,
to never acknowledge him. He is, after all, what they each fear most:
sexual misconduct in others (my mother) and dreaded homoerotic
feelings (my father).

A pervasive, long standing fear, or any negative emotion that rules us,
is a hard taskmaster, crippling our ability to freely love ourselves and
others. That was and is my parents. Throw in religion, and now you
have my parents unknowingly disguising themselves from themselves,
preventing themselves from seeing themselves.

It brings me some comfort, however, to know that, while they are not
able to love me, neither are they able to love other people like me,
including other immediate family members, who openly cast off
traditional moral values. Such people with "immoral life styles" bring
my parents too close to their own gripping fear that their own marriage,
or their own standing in religious society, could be compromised, some
day, some way, at some unguarded moment.

My mother's words, as important and as significant as they are to me,
that "I love you, and I always have" fail to empower her to actually live
in a loving relationship with her son, her fear of sexual misconduct in
others overpowering whatever feelings she may have for her son.

She must address her gripping fears, along with her husband's fear of
the homoerotic, and only then, I feel, will she free herself to openly
love me unconditionally and others like me who do not adopt her moral
values as their own.

My husband and I, we would, of course, welcome unconditional love
from my mother and father, but with every passing year it seems less
likely, especially knowing that religion, in their case, is their enabler,
that is to say, their brand of religion permits them, encourages them,
reinforces them, celebrates them in their resolve to disown their son
and his partner and others like us, gay or straight, who compromise my
parents' standard of moral integrity.

Essentially, It is their kind of religion that leaves them little to no room
for self-reflection or self-analysis as to what are the real factors,
rather than their religious code, that may be pushing them towards
cutting off all dealings with significant others.

It is their sort of religion that leaves them with no ability to adapt to society's changes around them, so that to say "I love you, I always have" is, sadly, a window to the past, a lamentation of what once was, a polite way to say "This is the parting of our ways."
 
______________________________
By clicking here, this article can be viewed at Other Sheep Exec Site, the site where Steve Parelli and Jose Ortiz share their stories, especially the stories of their travels for Other Sheep.
 

Sunday, November 11, 2012

Burmese Baptist Christians Translate, Print and Distribute book on the Bible and Homosexaulity


November 3rd, 2012, Book Launching Event Held in Thailand; Distribution Begun

by Rev. Steve Parelli
Other Sheep Executive Director
Florrissant (St. Louis), MO
November 11, 2012

 
Saw Yuri Galler, 2009,
then President of
Myanmar Gay Education

An openly gay Burmese Baptist Christian, Yuri Saw Galler, who was formerly the president of Myanmar Gay Education and a popular gospel singer in Thailand and Burma, working with Other Sheep and LifeJourney Press under a written contract agreement, recently oversaw the translation of the book The Children Are Free into Burmese, and the printing and distribution of 1000 copies.

In an email dated November 6, Yuri said the November 3rd book launching event, held in Thailand, was successful with over thirty guests attending, including individuals from NGOs (non-government organizations) and journalists who reported on the event.


 
  Thailand Portrait 06
David Aye Myat, in 2009,
as Support Executive of
Myanmar Gay Education, assited Yuri in the organ-izing the Other Sheep seminar.

Yuri further reported that the 1000 copies are being distributed free of charge. Already, copies have been distributed to Burmese Christians among the Burmese migrants in nine different refugee camps along the Thailand-Burma boarder. Other copies, said Yuri, are being "sent back" to Yangon, Burma, for distribution there, mainly to the parents of our LGBT Christian community.

The project, overseen by Yuri and totally funded by his friends and associates, needs to print additional copies. "1,000 [copies of the book] is not enough," writes Yuri, "but God will provide."
 
Printing costs per copy of the book is about $1 USD each. Donations to the printing of additional copies of the Burmese The Children Are Free, can be made by check to "Other Sheep" and designated for "TCAF Burmese Printing" and mailed to the following address: Susan Fazio, Treasurer, c/o Gordon Herzog, 16768 Old Jamestown Rd, Florissant, MO 63034-1409.

---------------------------------------------------------

A Forward to the Burmese The Children Are Free 2012 Edition: Other Sheep's significant role in bringing the inclusive message to the Karen Burmese Christians

The following forward was written by request of Yuri, the initiator and overseer of the translation, printing, distribution project.

A Forward from Steve and Jose of Other Sheep

In 2009, as husband and husband since 1997 and as co-laborers together since 2005 in an inclusive Christian ministry called Other Sheep, we travelled to Thailand, by invitation of a local seminarian student, to network in Chiang Mai among interested theological students. One person, living in Mae Sot, who took a great deal of interest in Other Sheep, was Saw Yuri Galler, President of Myanmar Gay Education, his mother a teacher at a Baptist theological seminary in Burma. Other Sheep (www.othersheep.com) is an ecumenical Christian ministry that works worldwide to empower LGBT people of faith.
Just days before our departure from Thailand, and while we were in Bangkok working Other Sheep, Saw Yuri phoned us and told us he had made arrangements for a small gathering of Karen Burmese Christians living in Mae Sot, Thailand, to hear our seminar on the Bible and homosexuality. Could we please come, he asked. We accepted
  Thailand Portrait 15
Joyce Hanks, a feat-
ured speaker at the
2009 Mae Sot
Other Sheep
seminar
Steve, not yet knowing that Yuri and the small group that would attend were from Baptist churches, remarked, with tears in his eyes, to Jose over their first wedding anniversary dinner celebration there in Bangkok, that the opportunity to minister in Mae Sot to Burmese Christians was personally very meaningful. As a formerly ordained Baptist minister, Steve had unsuccessfully attempted to have dialogue with his Baptist peer-pastors in upper New York State about the Bible and homosexuality. Now Steve was half a world away from his own Baptist associates, yet presenting his Biblical findings to Burma Christians where Adoniram Judson (1788 - 1850), the famous Baptist missionary and first Protestant missionary from North America to Burma, had brought the Gospel. With Yuri's invitation, here in Thailand, Steve experienced a measure of deep gratitude that he was, in some real meaningful way, tying-in with his Baptist roots and addressing his contemporary Baptist detractors by presenting the message of Other Sheep to Christian Burmese living in Thailand.
 
On Friday, August 28, following our morning seminar in Bangkok, we drove ourselves by rent-a-car to Mae Sot (perhaps a seven hour trip) to meet Yuri and David Ya late that evening and to present, the following morning, our seminar on the Bible and homosexuality - that God is no respecter of persons. At the seminar, we distributed copies of the book The Children Are Free in English. Following the Mae Sot Burmese seminar, we hurried our way back to Bangkok where, that evening - tired and exhausted yet exhilarated, we boarded our return flight to our home in New York City.

Mai Sot seminar

Above Photo:  August 29, 2009, the Mae Sot, Thailand, Other Sheep Seminar to the Karen Burmese Christians
Left to right: Steve Parelli, David Myat, Joyce Hanks,
Yuri Galler, Jose Ortiz

Three years later, with the translation and publication of this book into Burmese by Saw Yuri, those last two adventurous days in Thailand in 2009 have become all the more significant as treasured memories.

To Burmese Christians everywhere - gay and straight, lay and professional, may you eagerly receive this book from the hands and heart of the messengers who introduced it to Thailand and Burma: a one-time Baptist pastor and his beloved husband whose undergrad work was also in theology and world missions.

Together, as a gay Christian couple whose first love is, as best we know how, centered in God and others, we say to you, the message of this book will set you free.

Rev. Stephen R. Parelli
Executive Director of Other Sheep

Jose Enrique Ortiz
Other Sheep Coordinator for Africa and Asia

Tuesday, October 9, 2012, Bronx, New York, United States

Thursday, October 4, 2012

NFL Player Matt Birk vs. the Iowa Supreme Court on Gay Marriage

by Rev. Stephen Parelli
October 4, 2012
Bronx, New York
 
While supporting the right of his teammate Brendon Ayanbadejo, a Baltimore Ravens linebacker, to publically declare his support for same-sex marriage, Matt Birk, a center for the Baltimore Ravens, took issue with him and advanced his own counter-view on the marriage equality debate by authoring an opinion editorial that was recently published in his home state, in the Minneapolis Star-Tribune.
 
Birk offered but one argument for defining marriage as between a man and a woman:  “The union of a man and a woman is privileged and recognized by society as ‘marriage’ for a reason, and it's not because the government has a vested interest in celebrating the love between two people.  With good reason, government recognizes marriages and gives them certain legal benefits so they can provide a stable, nurturing environment for the next generation of citizens: our kids.”  Later, in the same piece, he repeats his argument:  “Marriage redefinition will affect the broader well-being of children and the welfare of society.  As a Christian and a citizen, I am compelled to care about both.”
 
This NFL player’s opinion needs to go up against the big league.  How about the Iowa Supreme Court? 
 
In their April 3, 2009, ruling that decided “the state statute limiting civil marriage to a union between a man and a woman unconstitutional,” the Iowa  Supreme Court examined the argument that “the optimal environment for children is to be raised within a marriage of both a mother and a father.”  The Court, after hearing “an abundance of evidence and research,” and confirming the findings by independent research, “that the children are served equally by same-sex parents and opposite-sex parents,” concluded that opposition to same-sex marriage “is less about using marriage to achieve an optimal environment for children and more about merely precluding gay and lesbian people from civil marriage.” This conclusion led the Court to further remark that “stereotype and prejudice, or some other unarticulated reason [rather than optimal environment for children], could be present to explain the real objectives” to same-sex marriage.
 
At the end of their ruling, after having rejected other arguments against same-sex marriage, the Court writes:  “Now that we have addressed and rejected each specific interest advanced” in defense of marriage as limited to a man and a woman “we consider the reason for the expulsion of gay and lesbian couples from civil marriage left unspoken . . . : “religious opposition [emphasis mine] to same-sex marriage.”
 
Obviously, Birk is no match for the Iowa Supreme Court.  In fact, his plea for dropping the “bigot” and “homophobic” labels for “people [like himself] who are simply acknowledging the basic reality of marriage between one man and one woman” losses ground against the Court’s statement:  “Whether expressly or impliedly, much of society rejects same-sex marriage due to sincere, deeply ingrained – even fundamental – religious belief.” 
 
In place of “bigotry,” one might say Birk is “religiously intolerant” especially in view of the fact that “marriage is a civil contract” and not a religious order or rite or creed.  Just as government, says the Court, “does not prescribe a definition of marriage for religious institutions,” neither, explains the Court, in a free society, do religious institutions, through the implementation of laws, impose upon society their particular religious views and practices.  “Civil marriage,” wrote the Iowa Supreme Court, “must be judged under our constitutional standards of equal protection and not under religious doctrines or the religious views of individuals.”  In this sense, Birk is either un-American, uninformed of the American way, or simply religiously intolerant of his fellow-citizens who hold a different belief system on marriage.
 
Is he “homophobic?”  Sure he is, even in spite of the fact that his pro-gay-marriage teammate Brendon Ayanbadejo tweeted “I don’t think he’s homophobic.” Matt Birk is buying into, and playing on, people’s fears when he says: “Marriage redefinition will affect the broader well-being of children and the welfare of society.” And when he ties his homophobia to his religious beliefs by saying “as a Christian and a citizen, I am compelled to care about both [society and children]” he is displaying his religious intolerance, tempting others to come very close to using the words “religious bigotry.”   
 
If we go with the Iowa Supreme Court’s assessment, Matt Birk, on the issue of gay marriage and optimum environment for children, is prejudice, or is being stereotypical, or his religious beliefs have left him totally partial.
 
According to Jim Daly of Focus on the Family, “Maryland state delegate Emmett C. Burns Jr., a Ravens fan, wrote a letter to the Ravens owner, Steve Bisciotti, asking him to prohibit his players from offering political commentary.”  Matt Birk might do well to take that advice long enough to do his homework.  As for Brendon Ayanbadejo who was the player that upset Burns with his pro-gay marriage comments, he needs to go right on upsetting the state delegate long enough until the state delegate sits down and carefully reads, and fully comprehends, the Iowa Supreme Court decision on gay marriage.